RankLeague table sorted by Entry Standards, please click the 'T- GUG' column to return to the original ranking
My T- GUGThe original Good University Guide ranking. InstitutionThe UK higher education institution. Stud. Satis- factionA measure of the average teaching quality of the university Res- earch Asses.A measure of the average quality of the research undertaken in the university Stud. - Staff Ratio A measure of the average staffing level in the university Acad. Servi- ces SpendThe expenditure per Stud. on library and computing Fac. Fac. SpendThe expenditure per Stud. on Stud. Fac. Comp- letionA measure of the completion rate of those studying at the university Good honou- rsThe percentage of graduates achieving a first or upper second class degree Grad. Pros- pects A measure of the employability of the graduates of a university Entry Stand- ardsThe average A-level score of new Stud.s under the age of 21.
11Cambridge16.66.612.21,5765749884.588.0529.7
22Oxford16.46.513.02,2203709889.478.5522.3
34London School of Economics15.36.413.21,2102119674.683.0470.7
45St Andrews16.75.715.48182089379.772.9458.1
516Edinburgh14.95.614.59992339277.876.6457.7
68Warwick0.06.017.11,4722339679.373.0453.2
73Imperial College14.76.49.72,5514799572.486.3452.6
810Durham15.55.720.38923319675.475.7451.8
933Aberdeen0.04.713.99342258064.376.0447.1
109Bath14.95.716.78044119576.878.9442.5
117Bristol15.35.714.91,1992799681.376.0440.0
1214York15.55.815.01,0151999571.064.4436.2

Previous Page - Next Page - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |11


Create your own ranking

There are two ways to customise rankings. Firstly, you can click the column headings on the table above to sort by a single criterion. Secondly, you can choose your own weightings for the criteria below (default values are those used for The Good University Guide rankings), make your preferred choice and click 'Customise' to generate the new table.

Student SatisfactionResearch Asses.Stud.-Staff RatioAcademic Services SpendFac. SpendCompletionGood HonoursGraduate ProspectsEntry Standards

For example, you might want to create your own league table based on three criteria only - say completion, graduate prospects and entry standards. Just click on these and weight them from 0.5 to 2.5 depending on how significant each one is to you. Finally, give all the other criteria a weighting of 0 (but they don't disappear!) and click on "Customise" for your very own ranking of the universities. To return to our default ranking , click on "TGUG" column

How the League Tables Work


Summary

  Student
Satisfaction

Research
assessment

Entry
standards
Student-
staff
ratio
Total
academic
services
spend
Facilities
spend
Good
honours

Grad.
prospects

Comple-
tion
Total

median

14.9

3.2

292.5

18.1

750

227

56.8

63.2

82.6

494

min

14.0

0.5

179.0

29.6

226

21

38.1

48.6

62.0

269

max

16.7

6.6

529.7

9.4

2551

574

89.4

88.0

98.4

1000

Notes

The following institutions provided their own data: Cambridge (student satisfaction), Oxford (student satisfaction), St Andrews (good honours), Exeter (entry standards and academic services spend), Keele (facilities spend), Robert Gordon (good honours), Nottingham Trent (student-staff ratio), Plymouth (entry standards), Glasgow Caledonian (facilities spend), Winchester (staff-student ratio), Northumbria (academic services spend and facilities spend), Portsmouth (student-staff ratio), Worcester (entry standards), De Montford (student-staff ratio), Lincoln (graduate prospects) and London South Bank (student satisfaction).

Data were used from the previous year for the following institutions and measures: Royal Holloway (student satisfaction), Queen's Belfast (completion), Birmingham (student satisfaction), University of the Arts (student satisfaction), Glasgow Caledonian (completion) and Greenwich (entry standards).

A value of 0.0 in the Student Satisfaction column is NOT a zero score. For English universities, it denotes  that scores were not available whereas for the Scottish universities it means that they did not take part in the National Student Survey

London Metropolitan University refused to allow the release of their data.